<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salter 1020 11 Pound Aquatronic Scale, White</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bestkitchenscale.com/blog/salter-kitchen-scale/salter-1020-11-pound-aquatronic-scale-white/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bestkitchenscale.com/blog/salter-kitchen-scale/salter-1020-11-pound-aquatronic-scale-white/</link>
	<description>You can find the perfect digital best kitchen scale here and shop online for great discount.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:00:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian D. Pollock</title>
		<link>http://bestkitchenscale.com/blog/salter-kitchen-scale/salter-1020-11-pound-aquatronic-scale-white/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian D. Pollock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestkitchenscale.com/blog/salter/salter-1020-11-pound-aquatronic-scale-white/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Overall I am happy with this scale, but as other have noted, it is mostly plastic and cheap feeling (my last aquatronic was more glass and metal), and the buttons are difficult to press. That is I have to press them 2 or 3 times sometimes for them to actually respond. Other than that, the scale works well, and seems to be fairly accurate. 
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall I am happy with this scale, but as other have noted, it is mostly plastic and cheap feeling (my last aquatronic was more glass and metal), and the buttons are difficult to press. That is I have to press them 2 or 3 times sometimes for them to actually respond. Other than that, the scale works well, and seems to be fairly accurate.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

